Legal Opinion

Hagans v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 21, 1948No. 31965PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacIntyre, P. 'J.

The defendant, W. T. Hagans, was tried and convicted under an indictment charging him with the offense of possessing non-tax-paid liquor. He moved for a new trial, which motion was overruled and he excepted.

“Generally 'voir dire’ denotes the preliminary examination ■which the court may make of one presented as a juror, where his competency or qualifications are objected to.” Croft v. State, 73 Ga. App. 318 (1) (supra). “In trials for misdemeanors there is no right to examine a juror upon his voir dire without first challenging him and assigning a cause of challenge.” Schnell…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Humphries v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Costly v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
  3. Croft v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Lingerfelt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Loomis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Flurry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  5. Newby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API