Croft v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
1. Generally "voir dire" denotes the preliminary examination which the court may make of one presented as a juror, where his competency or qualifications are objected to.
2. If either the State's counsel or the accused in a misdemeanor case wishes to test the partiality or bias of a juror, he has the right to make a motion for a preliminary examination, and request the judge to determine the qualification of the individual juror (this is what is referred to in technical language as putting the juror on voir dire).
3. In such a motion the movant should state the ground or grounds upon which he…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nobles v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- McIntyre v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- State v. LautenschlagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Loomis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Hagans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- Clemons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951