Legal Opinion
Cupo v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 6, 1972No. 5968PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
This appeal arises out of an action commenced by information in the name of the District of Columbia to determine paternity which was initiated just prior to the effective date of the District of Columbia Court Reform and Criminal Procedure Act of 1970. 1 Appellant makes a jurisdictional contention based on the assertion that the Corporation Counsel had no authority to continue to prosecute the case after the effective date of the Act. He also asserts that he was denied the benefits of “discovery” as contemplated in the new domestic relations rules for the Family…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- George E. Ross, Jr. v. The Honorable John J. Sirica, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Barrick v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
- George Swenson v. George P. Barrick and Allied American Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cessna v. MontgomeryIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- E.R.B. v. J.H.F.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- I. B. v. District of Columbia Department of Human Resources, Social Services AdministrationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Newman v. CoakleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- E.R.B. v. J.H.F.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.