Legal Opinion

I. B. v. District of Columbia Department of Human Resources, Social Services Administration

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1972No. 6017PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

These juvenile appellants seek reversal of an order dismissing their petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. Each was originally determined to be a “dependent” child under provisions of a now superseded law. 1 In their petition for the writ they challenged the sufficiency of a recent nontestimonial hearing which apparently looked anew into their present status. The particular assertion in the petition, and also here, is that the trial court’s review of their status, resulting in a determination that appellants were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ahrens v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Spock v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. McaFfee v. ClemmerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  4. Cupo v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Thompson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shipman v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Aronson v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
  3. Alston v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. In re N. M. S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. James E. McCall v. C. L. Swain, Superintendent, Lorton ReformatoryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API