Legal Opinion
Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc. And David Joe Ragan v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Sansom Refining Company
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 24, 1988No. 87-1372Published
1Opinion of the Court
850 F.2d 742
97 A.L.R.Fed. 521, 271 U.S.App.D.C. 49
DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT INC. and David Joe Ragan, Petitioners,
v.
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION and Sansom Refining
Company, Respondents.
No. 87-1372.
United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued April 29, 1988.
Decided June 24, 1988.
Richard L. Josephson, Houston, Tex., with whom Charles M. Darling, IV and J. Patrick Berry, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc., et al.
James T. Kelly, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Commodity Futures Trading Com'n, with whom Jay L. Witkin, Deputy Gen.…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.