Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Caudillo v. Chiuminatto

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided November 5, 1987No. 13-87-421-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENAVIDES, Justice.

In this original mandamus proceeding, relators seek to have this Court issue a writ of mandamus directing respondent to vacate his order prohibiting them from taking the depositions of two potential witnesses. We granted the application for leave to file and after hearing arguments of counsel, we now grant the issuance of the writ and conditionally order the writ to issue.

Texas Department of Human Services filed suit against relators, Lisa Caudillo and Samuel Caudillo, seeking involuntary termination of their parental rights to their infant daughter. Relators filed a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Weisel Enterprises, Inc. v. CurryTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Medical Protective Co. v. Glanz, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
  4. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Spears, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987
  5. McAllen State Bank v. Honorable Homer Salinas District Judge, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Collier Services Corp. v. Salinas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
  2. Pope v. StephensonTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Humphreys v. Caldwell, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  4. General Electric Co. v. Salinas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  5. HUMANA HOSP. CORP. INC. v. Casseb, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API