Legal Opinion

Pope v. Stephenson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1990No. C-9058PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves a trial court order protecting certain party communications from discovery under the “investigative” privilege of Tex.R.Civ.P. 166b(3)(d). The court of appeals decided that there was nothing in the record to indicate what facts the denied reports encompassed, and thus no basis existed from which to conclude that there was harmful error as required under Tex.R.App.P. 81(b)(1). 774 S.W.2d 743. We find no error in that decision.

We disapprove, however, of the apparent suggestion in the appellate court’s opinion that mandamus is the “timely” remedy for any wrongful denial of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Caudillo v. Chiuminatto, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
  2. Pope v. StephensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Perry Homes v. CullTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. City of San Benito v. Rio Grande Valley Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Fibreboard Corp. v. PoolCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Scott v. GalushaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API