Legal Opinion
Humphreys v. Caldwell
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided August 25, 1994No. 13-94-298-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YÁÑEZ, Justice.
By the present mandamus proceeding, re-lators, Danny Humphreys, Harlan Holiner, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (collectively “State Farm”), complain that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering the production of certain documents and other information in the course of discovery. We granted relators’ motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus. We are now of the opinion that the motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus was improvidently granted.
Following a 1991 automobile collision in Dallas between the real party in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Canadian Helicopters Ltd. v. WittigTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Abor v. BlackTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Axelson, Inc. v. McIlhanyTexas Supreme Court · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Conseco Finance Servicing Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
- In Re Mission Consolidated Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- In Re Nolle, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
- Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v. Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2018
- John Doe v. Catholic Society of Religious and Literary Education and Jesuit Collage Preparatory School of Dallas Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2021
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.