Hamilton v. Elkins
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Morgan Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.
This was an action by the appellee against the appellant for the recovery of the price and value of certain goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered, a bill of particulars of which was filed with the complaint.
The defendant answered: ist. A general denial. 2d.. Payment. 3d. Payment of a part of the amount in different sums and at different times, and the execution of a note-for the residue, which, it is alleged, the plaintiff accepted in-full discharge of the same; that he afterward paid off said, note, except as to one hundred and twenty-three dollars, for which he gave the plaintiff…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Bement v. MayIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Huber Manufacturing Co. v. BlessingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Chamness v. ChamnessIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- City of New Albany v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Glendy v. LanningIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.