Legal Opinion

Murray v. Hills Cab Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1963No. 7149PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTroop, J.

This cause is here on appeal from the trial court following an entry of judgment in favor of the plaintiffs-ap pellees, the jury having rendered its verdict in their favor against the defendant-appellant, Safety Cabs Company, which is the trade name under which City Cab & Storage Company does business. A judgment was also entered in favor of a defendant, Hills Cab Company, following the court’s direction to the jury to return a verdict in favor of that defendant and against the plaintiffs, Murray.

Defendant Safety Cabs Company filed motions for a new trial and for a judgment notwithstanding…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richmond v. ClintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Luken v. Buckeye Parking Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Piper v. Cambria Iron Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  4. Hudson v. Ohio Bus Line Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Flynn v. LittleOhio Court of Appeals · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Agosto v. Leisure World Travel, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Szymczak v. Midwest Premium Finance Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Faltysek v. KloepferAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  4. Rafoth v. National Union Fire Insurance (In Re Baker & Getty Financial Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API