Luken v. Buckeye Parking Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MATTHEWS, J.:
The jury found in favor of the plaintiff and the court rendered judgment thereon against the defendant for the value of an automobile as found by the jury. This appeal is from that judgment.
The plaintiff alleged in her petition that the defendant was in possession of premises at 107-117 Opera Place, Cincinnati, Ohio, and was operating thereon a parking lot, and oh which as bailee for hire it received automobiles; that on June 27th, 1944, she drove her automobile into said parking lot and delivered it to defendant’s custodian in charge under an agreement whereby…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Bommer v. StedelinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
- Hoddeson v. Koos Bros.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Raclaw v. Fay, Conmy and Co., Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Murray v. Hills Cab Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1963
- Rafoth v. National Union Fire Insurance (In Re Baker & Getty Financial Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.