Costanzo v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Gorman, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Dominic Costanzo and Ronald Kallam, the representatives of a class of independent-contractor insurance agents (collectively, the “agents”) under an exclusive contract with the defendants-appellees 1 (collectively, “Nationwide”), brought this declaratory-judgment class action 2 seeking a declaration of their rights in the ownership of the names and other information of Nationwide’s policyholders. Policyholder information is a valuable asset necessary for anticipating the future financial and insurance needs of Nationwide’s customers. Upon…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Shifrin v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mulch Manufacturing Inc. v. Advanced Polymer Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Buckeye Ranch, Inc. v. Northfield Insurance Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division2005
- Cincinnati v. HarrisonOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- United States v. AciernoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Beattie v. McCoyOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.