Legal Opinion

Buckeye Ranch, Inc. v. Northfield Insurance Co.

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Decided September 30, 2005No. 04CVH-07-7914PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frye, Judge.

J. Introduction

{¶ 1} This case primarily concerns the meaning of an insurance-policy exclusion incorporating, in substance, the “known loss” doctrine. In 1996, one boy sexually assaulted his younger roommate while both were long-term residents receiving treatment at The Buckeye Ranch, Inc. (“the Ranch”). The Ranch is a nonprofit institution that provides services, including a residential program, for children and families struggling with emotional, behavioral, and mental health issues. It had liability insurance coverage in force during 1996, written on a “claims-made” basis.…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. City of Willoughby Hills v. Cincinnati InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hamilton Insurance Services, Inc. v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. The Stroh Companies, Inc. And the Stroh Brewery CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Fifth Third Mortgage Company v. Chicago Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  3. Ernie Haire Ford, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2008
  4. Burlington Insurance v. PMI America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  5. Acuity v. Masters Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API