De Mercado v. Mukasey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The opinion filed in this case on August 21, 2008, 539 F.3d 1102, is amended as follows:
At page 11373 of the slip opinion, line 10, after the sentence concluding < scope of our review> delete <Even if the Mercados could demonstrate that the IJ misunderstood the support § 1183a requires Mr. Mercado’s brother to provide, their claim is simply an argument that the IJ underestimated the hardship their removal would cause. We lack jurisdiction over such questions
The panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge O’Scannlain and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Halim v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Pareja v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Morales-Izquierdo v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Ramos v. NielsenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- PADILLA-ROMERO v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.