Legal Opinion

Morales-Izquierdo v. Department of Homeland Security

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 2, 2010No. 08-35965PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner-Appellant Raul Morales (“Morales”) filed an application to adjust his immigration status to that of a lawful permanent resident. His application was denied because his prior removal from the United States made him “inadmissible.” Morales filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the rejection by an Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) official of his adjustment-of-status application, denial of which by the district court prompted this appeal.

Morales contends that under our circuit’s interpretation of the relevant statute at the time…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Delgado v. QuarantilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. Francisco Garfias-Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. John Murphy v. Directv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Saul Martinez v. Janet NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Richard Gebhardt v. Elaine DukeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API