Legal Opinion

Nabours v. McCord

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 3, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the District Court of Milam. Tried below before Hon. J. C. Scott. Justice Streetman being disqualified to sit in this case, T. B. Cochran, Esq., was appointed and qualified as Special Associate Justice.

1Opinion of the Court

COCHRAN, Special Associate Justice.

The plaintiffs in error, Fabours and others, brought this suit for their own use and for the use of all other accepting creditors of W. F. and F. M. Crawford under a deed of assignment made to defendants McCord and Henderson as assignees, naming as defendants the assignees and their bondsmen and the Milam County Oil Mill Company. At the trial the plaintiffs dismissed their suit as against the defendants Henderson and the bondsmen, and upon the verdict of a jury for the remaining defendants, judgment was accordingly entered, from which the plaintiffs have…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cook v. Berlin Woolen Mill Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Ellis v. SingletaryTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  3. de Everett v. HenryTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Keller v. Smalley & HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. W. L. Moody & Co. v. CarrollTexas Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Canadian Country Club v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Arrington v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. McCord v. BassTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  4. Bass v. McCordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Canadian Country Club v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API