Legal Opinion

W. L. Moody & Co. v. Carroll

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1888No. 5905PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Denton. Tried below before Special Judge A. H. Fields, the District Judge, F. E. Piner, being disqualified. The opinion gives the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Collard, Judge.

The principal question for determination in this case is: Is the assignment made by Fain, Peery & Shelton to J. A. Carroll, for the benefit of creditors void on its face? It is a general assignment of all partnership and individual property of every kind for the benefit of all creditors of the firm, providing for such creditors as accept under it, requiring bond of assignee, and in all its provisions indicating that the intention was to assign under the statute.

When such an assignment is made it comes under the statute and must be executed in the manner provided by the statute,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. SteeleTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Keller v. Smalley & HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Leon & H. Blum v. WelborneTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Schoolher, Bernstein & Co. v. HutchinsTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Fant v. ElsburyTexas Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. City National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Kerr v. GallowayTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Carter Bros. & Co. v. BushTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Commercial Standard Insurance Co. v. Merit Clothing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Pan American National Bank v. RidgwayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API