Legal Opinion
City of Oxnard v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 6, 1988No. Appeal 87-1638PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
We affirm the decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals 1 denying the claims of the City of Oxnard for payment, on behalf of the Department of the Navy, of a share of the cost overruns incurred by Oxnard in performance of Contract Nos. N62474-76-C-6511 and N62474-76-C-6512.
Discussion
In accordance with the contracts, Navy installations at Port Hueneme, California and Point Mugu, California would be connected to Oxnard’s sewer service lines and waste water treatment facilities, requiring inter alia the construction of adequate connections and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thanet Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- ITT Arctic Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- American Electronic Laboratories, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Dana Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- L.S.S. Leasing Corporation, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. United States, Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Conoco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- KMS Fusion, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Sterling, Winchester & Long, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Glenn Defense Marine (Asia) PTE, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Atlas Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.