Legal Opinion

Atlas Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 31, 1988No. Nos. 281-83C, 143-84C, 144-84C, 565-84C, 576-84C, 579-84C, 580-84C and 581-84CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEROW, Judge:

Plaintiffs are corporations, or successors to corporations, which participated in the contractual uranium procurement program of the then Atomic Energy Commission (AEG). This program commenced in the 1940’s and ended in 1970. As a result of recent scientific understanding as to the hazards of low level radiation, waste residues of the uranium production process, known as mill tailings, must now be stabilized at considerable expense. In this litigation, plaintiffs seek to recover this expense from the United States.

In each case defendant moves, pursuant to RUSCC 12(c) and…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Atlas Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. Treece v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Tasby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Yount v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API