Legal Opinion

Wells Ex Rel. Harris v. Odum

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbogdeN, J.

Is reasonable compensation for attorney for successful propounders in a caveat proceeding allowable and payable out of the assets of the estate?

The allowance of compensation to attorneys for caveators was discussed and decided by this Court In re Will of Howell, 204 N. C., 437, 168 S. E., 671. The Court said: “There seems to be no precedent in this jurisdiction for ordering an executor bringing the proceedings to pay out of the estate counsel fees for the attorneys for caveators. Nor is the authority supported in tendency by our decisions. They point in the other direction.” Therefore, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shepard v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Shepard v. BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. In Re Will of HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Overman v. . LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Overman v. LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Will of PendergrassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. In Re the Will of CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. In Re the Will of CoffieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Patrick v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API