Legal Opinion

Hinton v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 9, 2012No. 1110129PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Justice.

Anthony Ray Hinton petitioned the Jefferson Circuit Court (“the circuit court”) for relief under Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., arguing that his trial counsel had provided ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to provide a qualified expert in his defense at his capital-murder trial. The circuit court denied Hinton’s Rule 32 petition on the basis that Andrew Payne, the expert retained by defense counsel, was qualified to testify as a firearms-identification expert at Hinton’s trial. Hinton appealed to the Court of Criminal Appeals; the Court of Criminal Appeals, after…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. PerlsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. John M. Rice v. Arthur L. McKenzie Acting Warden, West Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  4. Ex Parte HintonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Delaney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  2. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  3. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  5. Hinton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API