Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hinton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 16, 1989No. 88-157PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

This is a capital case. The following issues are presented:

I. Whether the accused was deprived of a fair trial when two capital cases against him were consolidated for trial.

II. Whether it was error to allow evidence of ballistics tests when the bullets from the victims were introduced into evidence but the test bullets were not.

III. Whether it was error to allow a ballistics expert to testify about the test bullets when they had not been admitted into evidence.

IV…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. People v. LuckyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. United States v. Mayo Perez, DefendantsappellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Hinton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Bankhead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  4. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  5. Dill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API