Legal Opinion
Conti v. SHAPIRO, EISENSTAT, ETC.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 29, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
293 Pa. Superior Ct. 301 (1981)
439 A.2d 122
Milli CONTI and Rosario Conti
v.
SHAPIRO, EISENSTAT, CAPIZOLA, O'NEIL, LISITSKI AND GABAGE, PA and Carl Redel and City of Philadelphia.
Appeal of Carl REDEL.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued December 4, 1980.
Filed May 29, 1981.
Reargument Denied January 25, 1982.
Edward Benoff, Philadelphia, for appellant.
Mark R. Bosniak, Philadelphia, for Conti, appellees.
Lawrence W. Richman, Philadelphia, for Shapiro et al., appellees.
Richard W. Silver, Assistant City Solicitor, Philadelphia, for City of Philadelphia, appellee.
Before SPAETH, BROSKY and HOFFMAN, JJ.
HO…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Kraynick v. HERTZSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Liquid Carbonic Corp. v. Cooper & Reese, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Linett v. LinettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Sprouse v. Kline-Styer-McCann, Post No. 7155 Veterans of Foreign WarsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Duckson v. Wee Wheelers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Ruehl v. Maxwell Steel Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Langman v. Metropolitan Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- B. Lipsitz Co. v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Duckson v. Wee Wheelers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993