Wallace v. Mantych Metalworking

Brogan, Judge.

{¶ 1} Dan Wallace has appealed the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Mantych Metalworking on his claims of disability discrimination, disability harassment, retaliation, and wrongful discharge in violation of public policy. We conclude that based on the evidence presented, no fair-minded jury could return a verdict for Wallace on any of these claims, so summary judgment in favor of Mantych is proper. We therefore affirm the trial court’s judgment.

*29I

{¶ 2} In May 1998, Mantych Metalworking hired Dan Wallace, then 48 years old, to work as a model maker in its…