Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lambert v. Markley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 24, 1973No. 73-144Published

1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

I concur in all the majority opinion except that part relating to Point IV. As to that point, I think the failure to give AMI 605 was reversible error. In order to put the matter in proper perspective, the' wording of the instruction offered is of considerable importance as is the wording of Instruction 12 given on res ipsa loquitur, which was patterned after AMI 610. They read:

Defendant’s Requested Instruction — AMI 603

The fact that an injury occurred is not, of itself, evidence of negligence on the part of anyone.

Instruction No. 12: In addition to the rules of law I have just stated with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Delta Oxygen Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  2. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. GwilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Martin v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API