Legal Opinion

Delta Oxygen Co. v. Scott

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 26, 1964No. 5-3290PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

Appellee Tommy Scott filed two actions against appellant, Delta Oxygen Company (hereinafter called “Delta”), seeking to recover damages for injuries he sustained while using Delta oxygen in his welding work. In one action Scott claimed that Delta was guilty of negligence which caused his injuries; and in the other action Scott claimed" that Delta breached an implied warranty in regard to the oxygen. The two actions were consolidated for trial; the jury verdict and judgment was for Scott; and Delta brings this appeal, listing six points:

“1. The doctrine of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Glidewell, Admin. v. Arkhola Sand Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  3. Kapp v. Sullivan Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  4. Ratton v. BusbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  5. Nelson v. Armour Packing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Salvador v. Atlantic Steel Boiler Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Mays v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. C. C. Sanderlin v. Old Dominion Stevedoring CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  5. Boddie v. Litton Unit Handling SystemsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API