Legal Opinion
International Rectifier Corp. v. IXYS Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 11, 2008No. 2007-1063, 2007-1141, 2007-1165PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINN, Circuit Judge.
This patent case comes to us on appeal for a second time. Following our vacatur-in-part and reversal-in-part of a summary judgment of infringement, the district court held a jury trial. IXYS Corporation (“IXYS”) now appeals from the resulting final judgment of infringement. International Rectifier Corporation (“IR”) conditionally cross-appeals, asserting that the district court erred in its jury instructions. Because the judgment of infringement as to each asserted claim is foreclosed either by the combination of our mandate in the prior appeal and the jury verdict or by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Conoco, Inc. v. Energy & Environmental International, L.C.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc., Exxon Corporation and Exxon Research & Engineering Company v. The Lubrizol CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Marandola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Hyatt v. Director, Patent and Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.