Commonwealth v. Bailey
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
Appellant was summarily convicted by the Burgess of the Borough of Ingram of a violation of Section 20 of the Act of June 80, 1919, P. L. 678, relating to and regulating the us© of motor vehicles, et cetera, as amended by the Act of April 27, 1925, P. L. 254, 272. An appeal was allowed by the County Court of Allegheny County, which court, after hearing all the evidence offered on behalf of the Commonwealth and of the defendant, adjudged him “guilty of the offense of driving without proper lights as required by law” and imposed a fine and costs. Defendant’s motion for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eichman v. HerskerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Smith v. KaufmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Commonwealth v. FitzpatrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Farley v. Altoona & Logan Valley Electric Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- In re Doylestown Distilling Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CrandallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Conner AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954