In re Doylestown Distilling Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 168, Oct. T., 1898, by Doylestown Distilling Co., from decree of Q. S. Bucks Co., refusing application for distiller’s license. Application for distiller’s license. Before Yerkes, P. J. It appears from the-record that the petition and bond were in the usual form.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 168, Oct. T., 1898, by Doylestown Distilling Co., from decree of Q. S. Bucks Co., refusing application for distiller’s license. Application for distiller’s license. Before Yerkes, P. J. It appears from the-record that the petition and bond were in the usual form. It appears from the docket entries that an application was filed on April 11,1898, and refused on June 8, 1898. From the minutes it appears that on “ May 9, 1898, the court opened at 10:35 o’clock a. m., Hon. Harman Yerkes, President Judge, on the bench. Eo die. The petition of the Doylestown Distilling Company, Limited,…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee. Curiam,
We are asked to reverse the order of the court below upon the ground that the petitioners were not accorded a hearing. The order recites the fact that there was a hearing at the time appointed by the standing rule; that the evidence submitted on the hearing was considered; and that due regard was had to the number and character of the petitioners. There is nothing in the court minutes which is inconsistent with the record thus made up. Construing the record as a whole, and accepting it as verity, there was a hearing on May 9, the time appointed by the standing rule, and the matter…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth ex rel. Kaylor v. AsheSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Quinn's LicenseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Commonwealth v. BaileySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927