Legal Opinion
Plum v. Forgay Lumber Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 30, 1931No. Docket No. 4397PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), J.
This is an appeal from an order granting defendant’s motion for a change of venue from Sacramento County to Plumas County. The motion was made pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 397 of the Code of Civil Procedure, on the ground of convenience of witnesses.
The plaintiff commenced suit for damages in Sacramento County for malicious prosecution and false arrest. It is alleged the defendant wrongfully procured his arrest on a charge of grand theft. The criminal proceeding which was instituted in Plumas County was subsequently dismissed. It is alleged the plaintiff was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coley v. HeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Monk v. EhretCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Wrin v. OhlandtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Fitzhugh v. University of Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Scott v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rilcoff v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Stewart v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
- Finnell v. FinnellIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Excel Ins. Co. v. BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Carruth v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.