Legal Opinion

Ippolito v. Terragni

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 22, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Whatever might be the effect of the new section 121 of the Domestic Relations Law (as added by Laws of 1925, chap. 255) on a contract made since its enactment for the support *607of a child born out of wedlock, it cannot affect this action based on a contract alleged to have been made in 1922.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

All concur; present, Levy, Callahan and Untermyer, JJ.

The following is the opinion handed down in the City Court:

Evans, J.

If the complaint had for its purpose the enforce-

ment of the statutory obligation on the part of the defendant to support and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Haan v. HaanNew York Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesNew York Family Court · 1937
  2. Peterson v. EritslandWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation v. NeumanDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1970
  4. Burger v. NeumannNew York Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API