Burger v. Neumann
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.
Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that the alleged cause of action stated therein is against public policy and barred by sections 61-b, 61-d, 61-e, 61-f and 61-g of article 2-A of the Civil -Practice Act.
Section 61-b of the Civil Practice Act reads: “ Certain causes of action hereafter accruing abolished. The rights of action heretofore existing to recover sums of money as damage for the alienation of affections, criminal conversation, seduction, or breach of contract to marry are hereby abolished.”
The first eleven paragraphs allege, in substance, the background of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rosseau v. . RoussNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Fearon v. TreanorNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Todd v. . WeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Hook v. . PrattNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Halstead v. General Railway Signal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Levy v. GerstenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1949
- Fite v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Burger v. NeumannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947