Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Law

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 2005No. 74390-8Published

1Dissent

*109¶41 (dissenting) —The plain meaning and legislative history of RCW 9.94A.340 conclusively demonstrate factors used to support downward departing exceptional sentences do not need to relate only to the crime itself. Therefore Law’s exceptional sentence was appropriate.

Sanders, J.

¶42 The majority traces the recent history of the “nature of the crime” exceptional sentence doctrine but does not delve into the doctrine’s origins. There appear to be two sources for this “nature of the crime” doctrine. One is David Boerner, Sentencing in Washington § 9.6, at 9-13 (1985); the other is RCW 9.94A.340.

I.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. PascalWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. Ha'mimWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Herrin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  5. State v. PenningtonWashington Supreme Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API