Legal Opinion

State v. Ha'mim

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1997No. 64315-6PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

After Anzala Ha’mim was convicted of first degree robbery, the trial court imposed an exceptional sentence below the standard range set by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 because Ha’mim had no prior contacts with the police and because she was 18 years old when she committed the crime. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded to the trial court for resentencing. We affirm the Court of Appeals and remand for resentencing in light of this decision

FACTS

On May 1, 1994, Anzala Ha’mim, her twin sister, and a male companion went into a hair salon in Seattle. Joseph Baril and Hon Nan Yan were in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. RitchieWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. BranchWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In the Matter of CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. O'DellWashington Supreme Court · 2015

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API