Legal Opinion

State v. Pennington

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1989No. 55107-3PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

The State of Washington challenges the trial court's reasons for imposing an exceptional sentence under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA). It claims that a drug or alcohol problem, in and of itself, does not supply a justification to declare an exceptional sentence. We agree. We reverse and remand for sentencing within the standard range unless the trial court can find other reasons to impose an exceptional sentence.

Facts

On July 5, 1987, defendant, Ronald Ray Pennington, robbed a gas station attendant at knife point. Subsequently, he was apprehended and confessed that he purchased drugs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. McAlpinWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. BernhardWashington Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. AllertWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. LawWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. LawWashington Supreme Court · 2005

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API