Legal Opinion
Baran v. MEDICAL DEVICE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 25, 2007No. 1:04CV1251PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
KATHLEEN O’MALLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Gregory W. Baran, M.D. (“Bar-an” or “Plaintiff’) brings this patent infringement suit against Defendants Medical Device Technologies, Inc. (“MDTech”), Gedon AB (“Gedon”), Ascendía AB (“As-cendía”), and Anders H. Weilandt (“Weil-andt”) (Gedon, Ascendía, and Weilandt are hereinafter collectively referred to as “the Swedish defendants”), alleging infringement of two patents directed at an automated biopsy instrument that, according to the Complaint, 1 are issued to and owned by Baran. Specifically, Baran alleges in his Complaint that (1)…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Ccs Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation and Its Division Life FitnessCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baran v. Medical Device Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Baran v. MEDICAL DEVICE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- Rogers Industrial Products, Inc. v. HF Rubber MacHinery, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011