Legal Opinion
Baran v. MEDICAL DEVICE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 30, 2009No. Case 1:04cv1251PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
KATHLEEN McDONALD O’MALLEY, District Judge.
In this patent action, Defendant Medical Device Technologies, Inc. (“MDTech”) has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement (Doc. 164, “MSJ”). By way of its motion, MDTech argues that there is no genuine issue of material fact that MDTech does not infringe claim 7 of U.S. Patent No. 5,025,797 (the “'797 Patent”). Plaintiff Gregory W. Baran, M.D. (“Baran”) opposes the motion, which has been fully briefed and is now ripe for adjudication. 1 For the reasons articulated below, MDTech’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baran v. Medical Device Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Bell v. Toledo Gaming Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
- Chiaverini v. City of NapoleonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
- Hickok Inc. v. Systech International, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015