Legal Opinion

Rogers Industrial Products, Inc. v. HF Rubber MacHinery, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 17, 2011No. Case 5:09CV1181Published

1Opinion of the Court

CLAIMS CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM OPINION

SARA LIOI, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Rogers Industrial Products, Inc. and J.R.C. Leasing Co. (“plaintiffs”) filed the above-captioned case on May 21, 2009, asserting federal question jurisdiction and alleging one count of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,442,335 (“the '335 Patent” or “the patent in suit”) by defendants HF Rubber Machinery Inc. and Harburg-Freudenburger Maschinenbau GMBH (“defendants”). The '335 Patent is entitled “Apparatus and Method for Loading and Unloading a Tire Press.” On October 15, 2009, defendants filed their answer and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  5. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API