Legal Opinion

Hoover Motor Express Co., Inc. v. Taylor

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1947PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

This cause involves a contest between the Columbia Motor Express and the Hoover Motor Express Company, Inc., and the Franklin Transfer Company, wherein the former claims the right to a certificate of convenience and .necessity authorizing the operation of a motor freight line between Nashville and Columbia, Tennessee, in competition with the Hoover Company and the Franklin Transfer Company.

The Columbia Motor Express applied to the Railroad and Public Utilities Commission of Tennessee for a certificate of convenience and necessity, as above stated. Notice was given to competitors, especially…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Brenizer v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Dunlap v. Dixie Greyhound Lines, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Tenn. Cartage Co., Inc. v. PharrTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Johnson Freight Lines, Inc. v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hoover Motor Exp. Co. v. Railroad & Public Utilities CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Roberts v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  3. Puckett v. BroomeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
  4. Roberts v. Knoxville Transit LinesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  5. Blue Ridge Transportation Co. v. HammerTennessee Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API