Legal Opinion

Procter & Gamble Co. v. Stone Container Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 30, 2007No. MDL No. 1261; Nos. 03C-3944 (N.D.Ill.), 03C-6977 (N.D.Ill.), 03-CV-1702 (D. Md.)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DuBOIS, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MEMORANDUM.41

I. INTRODUCTION.41

II.BACKGROUND . to

III. DISCUSSION: STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS. A. Facts. 1. The Class Case. 2. The Direct Actions. 3. Tolling of the State Statutes of Limitations. B. Standard of Review. C. Analysis. 1. The Class Complaint. 2. Evidence Outside of the Class Complaint. 3. Class Action Tolling Does Not Apply to Contested Claims COC0050^rf^4^4^COCOCO

IV. DISCUSSION: SUFFICIENCY OF CONSPIRACY EVIDENCE A. Standard of Review. 1. Explanation of the Matsushita Standard. 2. Analyzing Evidence at the Summary Judgment Stage a. Parallel…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Linerboard Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API