Procter & Gamble Co. v. Stone Container Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DuBOIS, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
MEMORANDUM.41
I. INTRODUCTION.41
II.BACKGROUND . to
III. DISCUSSION: STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS. A. Facts. 1. The Class Case. 2. The Direct Actions. 3. Tolling of the State Statutes of Limitations. B. Standard of Review. C. Analysis. 1. The Class Complaint. 2. Evidence Outside of the Class Complaint. 3. Class Action Tolling Does Not Apply to Contested Claims COC0050^rf^4^4^COCOCO
IV. DISCUSSION: SUFFICIENCY OF CONSPIRACY EVIDENCE A. Standard of Review. 1. Explanation of the Matsushita Standard. 2. Analyzing Evidence at the Summary Judgment Stage a. Parallel…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Linerboard Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007