Legal Opinion

Nichols & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 27, 1968No. R.D. 11555; Entry Nos. 33875; 17688; 17PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

Three appeals to reappraisement have been consolidated for purposes of trial. The merchandise at bar consists of synthetic fibers, variously described as nylon staple and acrylic staple, of differing deniers and weights, some first quality and some substandard, all manufactured in France, bought there from the manufacturer by plaintiff’s commission merchant for plaintiff’s account, and *918imported at Boston in 1962. Although, the documents show shipment from Bremen, both plaintiff and defendant agree that France is the country of exportation; and this is accepted as fact, there…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Bloomingdale Bros. & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  2. United States v. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1941
  3. Daystrom, Inc., Intl. Sales Div. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  4. United States v. Daystrom, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nichols & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  2. Nichols & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  3. Nichols & Co. v. Untied StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. Magnesium Elektron, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API