Legal Opinion

United States v. Daystrom, Inc.

United States Customs Court

Decided March 16, 1966No. A.R.D. 203; Entry Nos. 463682; 772748PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richardson, Judge:

This application for review was filed by the Government for a review of the decision and judgment of a single judge sitting in reappraisement in Daystrom, Inc., Intl. Sales Div., et al. v. United States (United States v. C. M. Import & Export), 53 Cust. Ct. 447, Reap. Dec. 10834, and holding that cost of production is the proper basis of value of electronic radio tubes, exported from Japan and entered at New York.

The tubes involved in reappraisement R61/21866 were manufactured in Japan by Tokyo Shibaura Electric Co., Ltd. (referred to as “Toshiba”), are covered by one of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Casazza v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Kobe Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. Daystrom, Inc., Intl. Sales Div. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  5. United States v. F. W. Myers & Co.United States Customs Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frank P. Dow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Nichols & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Daystrom, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API