Legal Opinion
Shipman Coal Co. v. Delaware & Hudson Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 4, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcAvoy, J.
The appeals now here are from two orders, each vacating a levy by the sheriff of New York county on the property of the defendants Joseph and Edward Nahas, respectively, under a warrant of attachment which had been granted theretofore, and likewise vacating the orders for service of the summons by publication on those defendants who are non-residents. The orders appealed from are identical except the one relates to Joseph and the other to Edward Nahas, defendants.
The action in the case in which the attachment was issued was brought by a Pennsylvania corporation against the Delaware and Hudson…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- National Broadway Bank v. . SampsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- In Re the Claim of FlandrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
3Cited by4 opinions
- Huron Holding Corp. v. Lincoln Mine Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Motorola, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Lincoln Mines Operating Co. v. Huron Holding Corp.District Court, D. Idaho · 1939
- McCormick v. American Press Publications, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966