Legal Opinion
Lincoln Mines Operating Co. v. Huron Holding Corp.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided April 17, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAH, District Judge.
There are now before the Court two motions which were finally presented together and combined between the parties upon the record made at the hearing and they will now be considered and disposed of.
“First; Motion of the defendant for a satisfaction of the judgment, and, Second; Motion of the plaintiff for judgment against surety on the appeal bond after remand”.
As to the first motion the record discloses that on March 3, 1938 a judgment was entered in this Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of $6,730.70 and $79.42 costs. Thereafter on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Deposit Bank v. FrankfortSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Titus v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Olcott v. . the Tioga Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Huron Holding Corp. v. Lincoln Mine Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Christmas v. BuckleyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1942
- His Majesty's Government for the United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941