Legal Opinion

Peabody v. DiMeglio

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 12, 2014No. Docket No. 315319PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, Dany Jo Peabody, appeals as of right the probate court’s order granting summary disposition for defendant, Marta DiMeglio, in her individual and representative capacities, pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7), based on the expiration of the six-year statutory period of limitations for breach-of-contract claims. Defendant cross-appeals the probate court’s order denying her motion for attorney fees. We reverse the probate court’s grant of summary disposition and remand for further proceedings.

Plaintiff and Paul DiMeglio (the decedent) were married in 1989 and divorced in 1995. As part of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Barber v. Smh (Us), IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Gleason v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Diamond v. WitherspoonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Joe Solo v. United Parcel Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  2. Bowlers' Alley, Inc. v. Cincinnati InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  3. Kravitz v. Summersett (In re Great Lakes Comnet, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2018
  4. United States ex rel. Walter Toebe Construction Co. v. Guarantee Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  5. Department of Environmental Quality v. Hernan F GomezMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API