Legal Opinion
Meyers v. Chapman Printing Co., Inc.
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1992No. 92-SC-396-TG, 92-SC-397-TG, 92-SC-398-TG, 92-SC-399-TG and 92-SC-400-TGPublishedCited by 192 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBSON, Justice.
This is a case charging “sex” discrimination in violation of the Kentucky Civil Rights Act, KRS 344.010 et seq. Kay Denny Meyers (the employee) was discharged from her employment as a sales representative with Chapman Printing Company, Inc., on or about April 30, 1985. In January, 1986, she filed this suit against both her former employer, Chapman Printing, and its sole shareholder and CEO, Marshall Reynolds (the employer), alleging two separate causes of action, one for sexual harassment during employment and a second for gender-based discharge. Her claims were tried by jury…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Evelyn JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William P. CLARK, Secretary of the Department of the Interior, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by192 opinions
- Judy G. Morris v. Oldham County Fiscal Court John W. Black, County Judge/executive Brent LikinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- State v. StevensTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. CauthernTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- George Ford Mary A. Ford v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Osborne v. KeeneyKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
187 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.