Legal Opinion

R.W. v. T.F.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 4, 1994No. C7-93-819PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment entered following a jury trial in a garnishment action. The garnishment action was based on a judgment entered pursuant to a Miller!Shugart agreement. We affirm.

FACTS

T.F. was insured under a homeowner’s policy issued by North Star Mutual Insurance Company (North Star) effective July 9, 1983 through July 9, 1984. On March 17, 1984, T.F. had unprotected sexual intercourse with a woman at a hotel in St. Paul. A day or two later, T.F. noticed sores in his genital area. On May 4, 1984 and May 18, 1984, R.W. and T.F., both adults, engaged in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Prahm v. Rupp Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. PattersonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1995
  2. Gilman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API