R.W. v. T.F.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment entered following a jury trial in a garnishment action. The garnishment action was based on a judgment entered pursuant to a Miller!Shugart agreement. We affirm.
FACTS
T.F. was insured under a homeowner’s policy issued by North Star Mutual Insurance Company (North Star) effective July 9, 1983 through July 9, 1984. On March 17, 1984, T.F. had unprotected sexual intercourse with a woman at a hotel in St. Paul. A day or two later, T.F. noticed sores in his genital area. On May 4, 1984 and May 18, 1984, R.W. and T.F., both adults, engaged in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
- Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Prahm v. Rupp Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. PattersonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1995
- Gilman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996