Legal Opinion

Cameron v. City of Escondido

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 6, 1956No. Civ. 5181Published

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Respondents, city of Escondido, the city council, and the mayor thereof, proceeding under the Improvement Act of 1911 (Stats. 1911, chap. 397, p. 730) and Streets and Highways Code, section 5240 et seq., advertised for bids for construction of certain sewer work in that city. The bid proposal stated, among other things, that pursuant to section 5242 of the Streets and Highways Code, said bid should be accompanied by “a certified cheek payable to the city” or a bond in the amount of 10 per cent of the aggregate of the proposal, and that bids would be opened at 7:30 p.m. on August 3, 1955. At…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. City of Susanville v. Lee C. Hess Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Charles L. Harney, Inc. v. DurkeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. McCord v. LauterbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Cady v. City of San Bernardino Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API