Legal Opinion

Catalina Foothills Unified School District No. 16 v. La Paloma Property Owners Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 30, 2012No. 2 CA-CV 2011-0166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ESPINOSA, Judge.

¶ 1 In this eminent-domain/eondemnation action, defendant/appellant La Paloma Property Owners Association, Inc. (LPPOA) appeals from the trial court’s signed “Partial Judgment” dated August 29, 2011. Because we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal.

Factual Background and Procedural History

¶ 2 Plaintiff/appellee Catalina Foothills Unified School District No. 16 owns property, known as Block 24, which neighbors La Paloma, a subdivision in the Tucson area. Block 24 is bounded on its southeast side by Campo Abierto, a private drive owned by LPPOA that provides access to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Musa v. C. K. Adrian, M. D.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Englert v. Carondelet Health NetworkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. Clouse Ex Rel. Clouse v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marriage of Henderson v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  2. Flynn v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
  3. James S. v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API