Legal Opinion

Schaffer v. Hampton Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 20, 1931No. 28,278PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 235 N.W. 618, 236 N.W. 327. Plaintiff had a verdict in a suit upon two fire insurance policies issued by defendant covering two barns, shed, and silos on his farm which were damaged or destroyed in a fire occurring on the evening of December 17, 1928. A motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial was denied, and defendant appeals.

Of the two barns destroyed the smaller was the westerly, in which the fire started. The evidence is conclusive that at the time of the fire distillation of alcohol was carried on in the smaller barn. A great number of neighboring farmers called to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Liverpool & London Insurance v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Allen v. Home Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Kelly v. Worcester Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  4. Nebraska & Iowa Ins. v. ChristiensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  5. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nathan v. St. Paul Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Packard Manufacturing Co. v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  3. Board of Trustees of First Congregational Church v. Cream City Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. BachmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Brooks Upholstering Co. v. Aetna Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API